Hi everyone, As we discussed at this week's meeting, ChatGPT could be a useful tool for us to initiate content creation. While I'd never take its responses blindly, I do find that it is an effective research assistant and that I can significantly compress the time required to output quality content. Here is an example <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yq3Of9kuYFq4j2iyIAJ_zKVrD1hnz-0O9WftM-x4kOU/edit?usp=sharing> of using ChatGPT to create a framework for discussing the importance of and approaches to ensuring provenance that I literally did in <10 minutes. (Feel free to grab content from this if you like or drop comments in the doc - mostly I'm using this as an example of what we *could *do with the tool.) It would be great if we could get an official position from Kantara about whether ChatGPT or other generative AI-based content is acceptable as the basis for published works. I offer it as an approach, but look to leadership to provide guidance on its acceptability. Best, Joey -- Joey Pritikin Chief Product Officer +1 650 799 4611 joey@paravision.ai