Hi all, I updated the paragraph we discussed, hope it's clearer now. On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com>wrote:
*From:* Salvatore D'Agostino [mailto:sal@idmachines.com] *Sent:* Friday, February 07, 2014 9:45 AM *To:* 'j stollman'; 'Andrew Hughes' *Cc:* 'dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org'
*Subject:* RE: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion
Jeff,
These are a limited number of examples, I picked EU, vendor (Matrikon (Honeywell) and Siemens ) and the IEC on purpose so as not to require a lot of viewing and getting some cross sections to the list from time to time. I am sympathetic to the big link dump, unfun as you point out, sorry if this came across that way.
Andrew, please pass on the protégé link when it makes sense, there is also an attribute description there from Keith Hazelton there.
Ingo to your point about sensor, actuator, gateway. There are a few different ways this gets implemented depending on the intelligence in the sensor or gateway Here are some GE, Cisco and Qualcomm pictures that look at this a higher and lower views (GE and Cisco up a level, Qualcomm showing the circuit board to support this - I attached the related cut sheet <- talked about this with Paul M on the list). Figured we might discuss this today. Regards Sal
[image: cid:image005.png@01CF21BA.2A205770]
*From:* dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [ mailto:dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org<dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org>] *On Behalf Of *j stollman *Sent:* Monday, February 03, 2014 1:23 PM *To:* Andrew Hughes
*Cc:* dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion
I have a request for the group.
I am sure that I am not unique in having very little free time to devote to *pro bono* activities such as IDoT. I may be unique in being a particularly slow reader. When I get a note that provides a bunch of links, I glaze over at the prospect of having been given a large reading assignment. It would be helpful to me -- and, hopefully, to others, if contributors would provide some brief summary of each link so that we have a basis to prioritize which ones we read and which ones we don't. I recognize that this adds a burden to the contributor. But, if I am not alone in my perspective, it may be of overall benefit to the group.
Thank you.
Jeff
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000@gmail.com> wrote:
OK - I'll get something set up based on what's there - don't wait for me!
I'll be using Protege.stanford.edu
andrew.
*Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP Independent Consultant *In Turn Information Management Consulting*
+1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ *Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security *
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:16 AM, <Ingo.Friese@telekom.de> wrote:
Hi Andrew, Hi Sal,
Andrew, an OWL for the IDoT would be great. Very good idea.
For the beginning we have few terms from existing terminologies (e.g. http://www.iot-a.eu/public/terminology). Thanks Sal!
Here we have a for example a reference to: Sensor, Actuator and Gateway But at other points all these resources are rather unspecific. Here we have to find/discuss an appropriate terminology. On the other hand we do not have to define everything. I see maximum 3 to 5 terms we have to start with. Then we can describe already a lot of identity concepts around IoT.
Ingo
-----Original Message----- From: Salvatore D'Agostino [mailto:sal@idmachines.com] Sent: Montag, 3. Februar 2014 05:15 To: 'Andrew Hughes'; 'Ingo Friese' Cc: Friese, Ingo; dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org Subject: RE: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion
I think I put a few of these out to the thread. I appreciate Ingo's comments in that the identities perspective may not be well covered nonetheless let's consider;
http://www.iot-a.eu/public/terminology
http://www.industry.siemens.com/topics/global/en/industrial-security/support /pages/glossary.aspx
http://www.matrikonopc.com/resources/dictionary.aspx
http://www.psialliance.org/AreaControlOverview.html
IEC 61850 on electric substations. for starters of the top of my head, I
will dive in further, I will put these in a resources page on the wiki
and please others on list contribute.
Regards,
Sal From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:andrewhughes3000@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 1:23 PM To: Ingo Friese Cc: Salvatore D'Agostino; <Ingo.Friese@telekom.de>; dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion
These articles are from a quick google search - I only read the abstracts so cannot comment on content. Just food for thought.
If these are not of use, please disregard
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2093193 http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj247_0.pdf http://semanticweb.com/34702_b34702
On Saturday, February 1, 2014, Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Ingo - I agree, and wasn't aware you had done the scan
Does anyone have thoughts about creating an ontology for this and publishing it for anyone to use?
I want to / need to learn OWL in the next couple months and am willing to create this in parallel to this group. Parallel so I don't hinder your progress. This seems to be small enough scope to be manageable.
Thoughts? Andrew
On Saturday, February 1, 2014, Ingo Friese <ingo.friese@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Andrew, Hi Sal,
I think the terminology is just a pre condition for discussing Identity concepts. If there are already defined and widely terms...lets use them. I had a Look in different SDOs but I'havent found really good fitting stuff here. Do You know a good Source for terminology?
Ingo
Am 31.01.2014 um 22:59 schrieb "Salvatore D'Agostino" <sal@idmachines.com>:
+1 Andrew,
ithin+the+Internet+of+Things
"The purpose of this paper is to describe identity concepts in the Internet of Things. Identity mechanisms in the Internet of Things are different from those in the classic web.
Furthermore this paper proposes a terminology for Identity management in
Internet of Things. This should help to facilitate discussions and work in this area without the need to define basic terms again."
Agree we don't need to propose a terminology. Trying to wean any conversation about terminology out of my existence in fact ;-)
So maybe we can work on the abstract text before we go any further.
I like wading into identifiers as Scott has done. (I just trimmed a sentence and would like to talk more about this section).
From: dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hughes Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 3:31 PM To: Ingo.Friese@telekom.de Cc: dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion
Hi Ingo - I'm lurking on the list so have probably missed the context if
https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/IDoT/Concepts+of+Identity+w the the
terminology discussion.
Having just experienced a couple of drawn out vocabulary working groups, I am wondering why IDoT is not attempting to simply adopt a vocabulary/ontology/list of terms from any of the IoT specific groups.
Then, the focus here could be extensions to deal with the ID aspects...
Andrew.
On Friday, January 31, 2014, <Ingo.Friese@telekom.de> wrote: Dear All,
Jeff started with Sensor, Actuator and Processor. I'd like to extend this model a bit. Because I think the processor could be either near to the actuator (e.g. the processor in a house regulates the heating because of sensor data. This "intelligence" could also be somewhere in the cloud/internet. The processor could be a service on a server somewhere or and app on a smartphone. So I'd like to add an IoT instance in the network.
A second point are intermediates or gateways (names are to be discussed). Because many solutions have one or more instances between sensor/actuator an the service in the cloud. Here e.g. several sensors are concentrated.
What do you think?
Best, Ingo
-- Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP Independent Consultant In Turn Information Management Consulting +1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security
_______________________________________________ DG-IDoT mailing list DG-IDoT@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idot
-- Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP Independent Consultant In Turn Information Management Consulting +1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security
-- Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP Independent Consultant In Turn Information Management Consulting +1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security
_______________________________________________ DG-IDoT mailing list DG-IDoT@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idot
-- Jeff Stollman stollman.j@gmail.com 1 202.683.8699
Truth never triumphs -- its opponents just die out.
Science advances one funeral at a time.
Max Planck
_______________________________________________ DG-IDoT mailing list DG-IDoT@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idot
-- Scott Shorter, Principal Security Engineer, Electrosoft Services Inc. sshorter@electrosoft-inc.com O: 703-437-9451 x21 M: 240-994-7793
