- General comments were that this statement is a reasonable statement of
'why' the organization should exist.
- Discussion on the word 'defines' - does the ID Pro organization define
the profession? or does it reflect what's out there?
- The difficulty might be that this statement is too broad for _every_
practitioner out there - because if they don't join up to ID Pro, they are
still practitioners.
- All - to look for examples of how this is stated in other associations
Question: if we strike 'defines' does it work?
*Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP
Independent Consultant
*In Turn Information Management Consulting*
o +1 650.209.7542
m +1 250.888.9474
1249 Palmer Road,
Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com
ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/
*Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security *
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Ian Glazer
"The organization defines, supports, promotes and improves the global profession of individuals involved in ensuring Digital Identities are professionally and ethically used and managed using secure, privacy-protecting and reliable practices.”
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer
_______________________________________________ DG-IDPro mailing list DG-IDPro@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idpro