- General comments were that this statement is a reasonable statement of 'why' the organization should exist. - Discussion on the word 'defines' - does the ID Pro organization define the profession? or does it reflect what's out there? - The difficulty might be that this statement is too broad for _every_ practitioner out there - because if they don't join up to ID Pro, they are still practitioners. - All - to look for examples of how this is stated in other associations Question: if we strike 'defines' does it work? *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP Independent Consultant *In Turn Information Management Consulting* o +1 650.209.7542 m +1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ *Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security * On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
"The organization defines, supports, promotes and improves the global profession of individuals involved in ensuring Digital Identities are professionally and ethically used and managed using secure, privacy-protecting and reliable practices.”
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ DG-IDPro mailing list DG-IDPro@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idpro