Unsigned. This is an off week. I suggest that we work with the google doc asynchronously to accomplish the below, and review at the recurring biweekly meeting next week. From: Salvatore D'Agostino Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 12:35 PM To: Mark Lizar <mark@transparencylab.ca>; Gigi <gigi@transparencylab.ca> Cc: wg-ancr@kantarainitiative.org Subject: RE: ANCR TPR - Next Steps. I agree with this. I believe we have gotten to this point already and are trying to publish the TPR Specification as such. From: Mark Lizar <mark@transparencylab.ca<mailto:mark@transparencylab.ca>> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 12:21 PM To: Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com<mailto:sal@idmachines.com>>; Gigi <gigi@transparencylab.ca<mailto:gigi@transparencylab.ca>> Cc: wg-ancr@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:wg-ancr@kantarainitiative.org> Subject: ANCR TPR - Next Steps. Dear ANCR, After having a break from the TPR report, and mulling it over. I think i have figured out how to disentangled the elements we have. I recommend, that we specify the report without the schema, and put the schema in the appendix, (take the rating from the appendix and put in the main document. Then I recommend we spin the schema up into a separate document (lightweight) as a digital identity controller record schema. In the context of a secure notice information record structure, for both security of industrial uses, non-personal information, as well as personal information. Then do a really nice security and privacy considerations section. we practically have two documents we can quickly finish and produce to a stable draft, and lots to blog about. Kind Regards, Mark Lizar Mark Lizar Executive Director Transparency Lab @ Global Privacy Rights