Hi Richard, Thankyou very much for sending this through. I agree with you, I have been spending hours on it and it is slow going. Divide and conquer sounds good, especially as I am going through all of it so we could cover it that way. That said, I have been looking through your spreadsheet and despite your point that it is slow I think that is a consequence of the obvious thoroughness you are applying. Thanks, Caro On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:19 PM Richard G. WILSHER (@Zygma Inc.) < RGW@zygma.biz> wrote:
If I have missed any other postings of review comments re. -63 rev.4, apologies. I’ve gone for reviewing -63A before anything else, normative clauses only, and its slow going. Maybe we need to divide and conquer – some on A, some on B, some on C? I suspect the base doc is worthy of attention from everyone since it, theoretically at least, affects A, B and C ?
Anyway, here are my scattered thoughts thus far.
*Richard G. WILSHERCEO & Founder, Zygma Inc.www.Zygma.biz http://www.Zygma.biz+1 714 797 9942*
_______________________________________________ A Community Group mailing list of KantaraInitiative.org WG-IDAssurance mailing list -- wg-idassurance@kantarainitiative.org To unsubscribe send an email to staff@kantarainitiative.org List archives -- https://mailman.kantarainitiative.org/hyperkitty/list/wg-idassurance@kantara... ______ Group wiki -- https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/WG-IDAssurance