- WG-UMA - mailman.kantarainitiative.org

Agenda for UMA telecon 2015-11-19
by Eve Maler 18 Nov '15

18 Nov '15

(Sorry for the delay in sending — lovely windstorm and power outage in Seattle yesterday…) http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+telecon+2015-11-19 Date and Time Thu Nov 19, 9-10am PT Voice: Skype: +99051000000481 or US +1-805-309-2350 (international dial-in lines <https://www.turbobridge.com/join.html>), room code 178-2540# Screen sharing: http://join.me/findthomas <http://join.me/findthomas> - NOTE: IGNORE the join.me dial-in line shown here in favor of the dial-in info above (Kantara "line C" and the Skype line) UMA calendar: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar> Agenda Roll call Approve minutes of UMA telecon 2015-09-24 <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+telecon+2015-09-24> and UMA telecon 2015-11-05 <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+telecon+2015-11-05> Status of V1.0.1 process LC ballot to certify Draft Recommendations has passed Kantara All-Member Ballot process can begin shortly after a few "metadata edits”; complete by end of 2015 Funding requests IETF 94 news API management <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-oauth-6.pdf> interest related to UMA Permission registration extension spec review and discussion AOB Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl(a)gmail.com

1 0

FW: Authentication and Authorization for Research, and Collaboration 2: expressions of interest
by Keith Hazelton 15 Nov '15

15 Nov '15

The major authNZ initiative in EU at the moment, focusing on user-driven innovation. ________________ On 2015-11-15, 03:22, "David Groep" <davidg(a)nikhef.nl> wrote: >Dear FIM4R and parties interested in AAI for collaboration and research: > >As you are likely aware the Authentication and Authorization for Research >and Collaboration project AARC [aarc-project.eu] works towards an >integrated authentication and authorization infrastructure - built on >federated access - to enable users (using their existing credentials) to >seamlessly access e-infrastructures and support increased penetration >of federated access. Supporting actions include training and policies >and best practices harmonization. > >With this communication we would like to inform you about the plans >by the AARC Board and Project Partners to reply to the "User-driven >e-infrastructure innovation" call [1] by the EC, with a focus on >user-driven innovation and pilots on existing e-Infrastructures to >respond to user-community challenges > >You are requested to read the attached document and consider the >next steps detailed therein to help our researchers, educators and >students with an AAI that facilitates inter-federated usage >and sharing of resources. > > With kind regards, > Licia Florio, p.p. David Groep. > >[1] Please see >http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/ >h2020/topics/2120-einfra-22-2016.html > >-- >David Groep > >** Nikhef, Dutch National Institute for Sub-atomic Physics,PDP/Grid group >** >** Room: H1.50 Phone: +31 20 5922179, PObox 41882, NL-1009DB Amsterdam NL >**

1 0

Draft minutes of UMA Legal telecon 2015-11-13
by Adrian Gropper 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

Minutes Jim - GAGH (Global Alliance for Genetics and Health) - With machine readable consent group. Starting with taxonomy for access. Figure out a way of handling the specification of authorization of use of a genome. With Thomas working on a UMA / Common Accord / Blockchain hack. Scot interested in gene information sharing. Adrian also involved via a Mayo Clinic genomic determinism and data management. Steve with blockchain. Ann wants to help. Will be at FutureCommerce Hackathon. Thomas: CommonAccord for GitHub contract version tracking and specialization. The core contribution from Jim allows modularized pieces of the contract. Transacting parties A and B would each have to set up their own GitHub client and each time a party makes a change a hash is sent along with the diff that's sent to the other party and the hash is also put up on a blockchain. UMA comes in for the privacy aspects of the contract. Access control to contract via UMA to avoid having to ship the contract around. Consents expressed in CommonAccord format - points to data item - Organize the machine readable consent to drive UMA policies. CommonAccord + UMA + Blockchain is a general solution. Blockchain is advertising my signature / providing non-repudiation / for the process. Helps with escrow. SHA-1 to find data a la BitTorrent and SHA-256 are combined. May need to also conform to the Digital Signature Act using X509. Stock market analogy - stock certificates, then derivatives. Multi-channel verification of rights. What can we code to explain this? CommonAccord interacting in a GitHub like server + add the hash drop out - then add UMA and later blockchain. Patient consent or material transfer agreements. Jim demos NDA between two parties. Called Nameless. Common Accord + code to build something like a Merkle tree + post hash to blockchain as the minimum viable demo. Separate piece of this - what would be a taxonomy of access - by adding UMA - Dazza suggests the iAuth project for FutureCommerce that takes the hash of a commit in GitHub and its message digest via GitHub API (blocksign) - then make it so one of the commits are linked to OAuth2 / UMA and tied to a scope. Let's continue this discussion on 1 2 or 3 projects on the Slack channel for the next week as prep for http://futurecommerce.civics.com/index.html Please email Dazza or Mark to join the Slack channel (I don't seem to have invite power). Legal call next week will go on as scheduled and FutureCommerce starts an hour after (1PM EST). ----------- Proposed Agenda: - How can we reduce legal and business barriers to real-world UMA adoption? - What does the link between a minimal / personal UMA AS and Agency Law look like on GitHub? - FutureCommerce Hackathon at MIT and online next Friday - starts an hour after the end of our UMA Legal call http://futurecommerce.civics.com/index.html - AOB Roll call Attending Clayton Bonnell - USPS - Postal Inspection Service Steve John Jim Paul Thomas Ann Scot Sal Dazza -- Adrian Gropper MD <http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/>

1 0

Reminder: UMA legal subgroup telecon 2015-11-13
by Adrian Gropper 13 Nov '15

13 Nov '15

- *Fri Nov 6* 8-9am PT - Voice: Skype: +99051000000481 or US +1-805-309-2350 (international dial-in lines <https://www.turbobridge.com/join.html>), room code 178-2540# - Screen sharing: http://join.me/findthomas - *NOTE:* *IGNORE* the join.me dial-in line shown here in favor of the dial-in info above (Kantara "line C" and the Skype line) - UMA calendar: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar - How can we reduce legal and business barriers to real-world UMA adoption? - What does the link between a minimal / personal UMA AS and Agency Law look like on GitHub? - FutureCommerce Hackathon at MIT and online next Friday - starts an hour after the end of our UMA Legal call http://futurecommerce.civics.com/index.html - AOB Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl(a)gmail.com _______________________________________________ WG-UMA mailing list WG-UMA(a)kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma -- Adrian Gropper MD PROTECT YOUR FUTURE - RESTORE Health Privacy! HELP us fight for the right to control personal health data. DONATE: http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/

2 2

This will get more people talking about HEART
by Adrian Gropper 11 Nov '15

11 Nov '15

http://geekdoctor.blogspot.com/2015/11/the-path-forward-for-meaningful-use.… Halamka is arguably the chief spokesperson for the health IT industry. Adrian -- Adrian Gropper MD PROTECT YOUR FUTURE - RESTORE Health Privacy! HELP us fight for the right to control personal health data. DONATE: http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/

1 0

Gluu Blog: How to centrally issue OAuth tokens for API access management
by Mike Schwartz 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

Umatarians, I wrote a quick blog this afternoon about using UMA for API access management: http://www.gluu.co/central-oauth2-tokens Any comments are welcome if I messed it up or missed anything crucial. - Mike ------------------------------------- Michael Schwartz Gluu Founder / CEO mike(a)gluu.org

1 0

Notes from UMA legal subgroup telecon 2015-11-06
by Eve Maler 08 Nov '15

08 Nov '15

Fri Nov 6 8-9am PT Voice: Skype: +99051000000481 or US +1-805-309-2350 (international dial-in lines <https://www.turbobridge.com/join.html>), room code 178-2540# Screen sharing: http://join.me/findthomas <http://join.me/findthomas> - NOTE: IGNORE the join.me <http://join.me/> dial-in line shown here in favor of the dial-in info above (Kantara "line C" and the Skype line) UMA calendar: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar> Goal: start building a general "legal stack" for UMA-specific elements Learn more of Andrew H’s use case details Examine the sociotechnical norms for potentially useful concepts AOB Attending: Eve, John, Ann, Adrian, Andrew H, Jim, Jon, Mark, Nat, Sal Andrew has sketched a model for resource set registration services. So far this is very informal, so we won’t be minuting it in detail. What’s a better word/phrase for “community of interest”/CoI? Policymakers? Constituents? He’s trying to capture “reliance” relationships, and obligations/commitments. Adrian has concerns: Can we look at the simplest possible scenario and just map that? On the other hand, providing “legal resources” (akin to “developer resources”) for those who have constraints that require an UMA solution would be very valuable, because this is a real-world situation that we expect to be common. The “Open Identity Trust Framework Model <http://openidentityexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/the-open-identity-trust-…>” white paper may be useful for background on generic trust frameworks. OITF was influenced by the Liberty Alliance work, and Andrew has contributed to TF work heavily over time. Once you have the abstract model, then you can identify your specific “users” and “operators”. So can we make progress on our goal, given Andrew’s input? We could work on outputs for his “C” elements, and a lot of the “B”. Jurisdiction clauses are something everyone needs. And if we pick a business environment (university, or health, or DIACC!), we know of typical clauses they’ll need. UMA-specific stuff may affect, all of the business, legal, and technical sections (portions of the stack). Standardizing these clauses is the benefit we’re aiming to supply. Can we use the sociotechnical norms language <http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/mas/IJCAI-15-TIST.pdf>? Eve suggests that the five norms are so clear, and clarifying, that they would be helpful for distinguishing the piece-parts of UMA flows that reflect different norms and developing model clauses for each of the B, L, and T layers that can focus on one type of norm at a time. John W thinks that there is relevance for consent receipts. Eve muses: Maybe Authorization could be for true consent receipts, and Commitment, Prohibition, Sanction, and Power could be for other types of transaction receipts? Powers could be conveyed to another party (such as durable medical power of attorney), and then there could be a flow chart after that where prohibitions and sanctions and such come into play. Next steps: Adrian is kindly running the next call. He will send out an agenda focusing on agency restatements. After her vacation, Eve will work with John and Andrew (and maybe rope in Tim as well?) on recasting whatever old Binding Obligations are still useful into norms language, and try to bucket them into B/L/T clauses for putative sections of a “stack". Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl(a)gmail.com

8 8

FutureCommerce Hackathon & Symposium Event at MIT
by Adrian Gropper 06 Nov '15

06 Nov '15

Previews and Live Discussion: Monday, November 9th at 2:00pm Eastern via this page: http://futurecommerce.civics.com/index.html#whats-next <http://futurecommerce.civics.com/index.html#whats-next>FutureCommerce Hackathon & Symposium November 20-22, 2015 Online and In-Person Open Event *by* MIT Connection Science @ The Media Lab ------------------------------ The FutureCommerce Hackathon and Symposium is a creative event for team-based generation of innovative commercial products, services, transactions, experiences, relationships and business models. Enroll and/or propose a project at http://futurecommerce.civics.com/index.html --- Shameless plug: I will be proposing a GitHub project to create an open source reference implementation of a _personal_ UMA Authorization Server. The goal is to accelerate adoption of standard APIs for controlled access to the personal information that service providers have about us. The project is called HIE of One. It's not healthcare specific. Attend the Nov 9 preview and/or just connect with me directly if you would like to know more. -- Adrian <http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/> <http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/>

1 0

UMA testing / SecurityLoft / Client calls API
by Mike Schwartz 06 Nov '15

06 Nov '15

UMA-tarians, We've been talking about interop / conformance testing for a long time, and I think we need to get this to the starting line. There are a lot of UMA use cases that we need to prove out. I think we all agree that in order to move forward, we should start small, and in each iteration, cover more cases. This past IIW, I broached the idea of forming a new volunteer organization called "SecurityLoft". I have been inspired by OWASP. To start, SecurityLoft would just be a website, and a cloud server somewhere. I spoke with Kelly Grizzle at Sailpoint about hosting SCIM conformance tests at SecurityLoft. Perhaps SecurityLoft could also host UMA tests. The specific use case I think we should start with is (drum roll please...): Client calls API on Resource Server To get this done, we'll need to make a policy that any client can call to test positive and negative results. To make it easy to start with, I suggest using a policy based on time. In order to get a successful request, the permission ticket must be registered in the first 15 seconds of the minute. Just an idea... I was also thinking perhaps the UMA client could send claims as a json payload. Modest start? Yes! But at least a start that shows something tangible! - Mike

2 1

Reminder: UMA legal subgroup telecon 2015-11-06
by Eve Maler 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Fri Nov 6 8-9am PT Voice: Skype: +99051000000481 or US +1-805-309-2350 (international dial-in lines <https://www.turbobridge.com/join.html>), room code 178-2540# Screen sharing: http://join.me/findthomas <http://join.me/findthomas> - NOTE: IGNORE the join.me <http://join.me/> dial-in line shown here in favor of the dial-in info above (Kantara "line C" and the Skype line) UMA calendar: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar> Goal: start building a general "legal stack" for UMA-specific elements Learn more of Andrew H’s use case details Examine the sociotechnical norms for potentially useful concepts AOB Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl(a)gmail.com

1 0