
19 Jul
2015
19 Jul
'15
3:14 p.m.
How much of RFC7591 would be different in a specification for how a resource owner registers their home-built authorization server with a protected resource? Adrian On Saturday, July 18, 2015, Eve Maler <notifications@github.com> wrote:
UMA Core contains a number of references to [DynClientReg], which spec is now IETF RFC 7591. The normative reference should be updated to point to the final document:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <https://github.com/xmlgrrl/UMA-Specifications/issues/174>.
-- Adrian Gropper MD Ensure Health Information Privacy. Support Patient Privacy Rights. *http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/* <http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/>